corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 9160

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Carlson AM, Morris LS.
Coprescription of terfenadine and erythromycin or ketaconazole: an assessment of potential harm.
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 1996 Apr; NS36:(4):263-9


Abstract:

PURPOSE: In a retrospective study, the authors used a pharmacy claims database to analyze the rate of coprescription of terfenadine and erythromycin or ketaconazole. STUDY PERIOD: The investigators reviewed claims filed for these drugs between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 1993. The time period allowed for comparison of coprescription rates before and after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required the manufacturer of terfenadine to inform the medical community of potentially serious adverse interactions. RESULTS: There were 5,802 coprescription events for terfenadine and erythromycin and 150 coprescription events for terfenadine and ketaconazole. Rates per 100,000 terfenadine users demonstrated large declines about 18 months after initial regulatory action. Coprescription events of terfenadine with either erythromycin or ketaconazole continued to occur despite regulatory action. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest important roles for the pharmacist as a risk manager, disseminating information about newly published drug interactions. Both health providers and patients are audiences for the pharmacist’s drug expertise. The delay in physician reaction to new information from pharmaceutical companies and the federal government suggests an early, strong role for the pharmacist in changing prescribing behavior.

Keywords:
Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects* Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects* Antifungal Agents/adverse effects* Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems Drug Interactions Erythromycin/adverse effects* Health Maintenance Organizations/legislation & jurisprudence Insurance Claim Review Ketoconazole/adverse effects* Retrospective Studies Terfenadine/adverse effects*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.