corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6822

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Aslam N.
Pharmaceuticals lack seriousness to provide more information on request
The Network’s Drug Bulletin 1998 Oct-Dec; 7:(5-6):12-16, 19


Abstract:

Doctors in Pakistan were asked to write to pharmaceutical companies requesting more information about products made by the company. Out of 152 letters, only 39 were responded to and only 27 responses were received within 30 days. The response rate from multinational companies and domestic companies was no different, 26% and 24%, respectively. Only six of the 39 responses fully met the World Health Organization criteria for optimal drug information.

Keywords:
*analytic survey/Pakistan/developing countries/information from companies/doctors/INFORMATION FROM INDUSTRY: DOCTORS


Notes:

Methodology note: The method of randomly selecting the promotional brochures is not described. The brochures received by the doctors in the three cities in question may not be typical of all promotional brochures. The study does not state how the quality of the company responses was assessed.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.