corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6817

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Sheldon T.
Drug promotion—how ethical is direct-to-consumer advertising?
Scrip Magazine 1998 Jul-Aug; (70):21-22
www.pjbpubs.co.uk/scrip/scrhome.html


Abstract:

The new report by Health Action International describes an inherent conflict of interest between the legitimate business goals of the pharmaceutical industry and the social, medical and economic needs of providers and the public to select and use drugs in the most rational way. This conflict has lead to the growing lack of clarity between commercial product information intended to increase sales and independent, objective information about a drug. The promotion of direct-to-consumer medications that attracts the most controversy. Industry representatives argue that extreme cases of DTCA abuse could not take place in countries with well regulated systems and that DTCA can empower consumers. Barbara Mintzes who wrote the HAI report rejects this argument. The report concludes by pressing for all drug promotion to be regulated through legislation and monitored and enforced through national governments or independent bodies able to impose an escalating scale of sanctions.

Keywords:
*analysis/HAI/Health Action International/DTCA/direct-to-consumer advertising/industry perspective/regulation of promotion/ profit motive/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: INDUSTRY/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: AUTONOMOUS BODIES/REGULATION, CODES, GUIDELINES: DIRECT GOVERNMENT REGULATION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963