corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 5705

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Information overload—presentation materials
1993 Nov


Abstract:

671 physicians were interviewed for this survey. Doctors received 9 controlled circulation journals per month and 49% of all them were opened and part or all of them were read; 44% of direct mail was opened; and six sales representatives were seen per month. Pharmaceutical representatives, company-produced product brochures, non-peer reviewed journals and unsolicited mail were scored 3.9, 3.7, 3.4 and 2.5, respectively out of 7 on a scale of usefulness (1=useless, 7=very useful). General practitioners gave sales representatives the highest score for usefulness, 4.4 out of 7.

Keywords:
*analytic survey/Canada/doctors/value of promotion/source of information/primary care doctors/promotional literature/ controlled circulation journals/ sales representatives/ direct mail/PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: DOCTORS/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: DETAILING/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: DIRECT MAIL/PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: MISCELLANEOUS

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend