corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 554

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Hueston WJ, Mainous AG 3rd.
A comparison of the numbers of pharmaceutical advertising pages in family medicine research journals and journals in other medical disciplines.
Acad Med 1997 Sep; 72:(9):804-6


Abstract:

PURPOSE: To determine whether declines in pharmaceutical industry advertising have been greater for family medicine research journals than for journals in other disciplines. METHOD: Three family medicine research journals and eight randomly selected journals in other disciplines were chosen for this study. The number of advertising pages from the first issue of each journal from 1990 through 1995 were calculated by manually counting every journal page that contained all or part of an advertisement for a pharmaceutical product. Data were compared using Student’s t-test. RESULTS: Overall, the mean number of pages of pharmaceutical advertising in all of the journals fell 41%, from 34 pages in 1990-1991 to 21 pages in 1994-1995. For the three family medicine journals the drop over the same six-year period was 55% (from 30 to 14, p = .01), compared with a 35% drop for the eight other journals (from 36 to 23, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Although advertising in medical research journals has dropped in all disciplines, it would appear that the decline for family medicine journals has been disproportionately large. The potential effect of this decline for the discipline of family medicine is a decrease in the outlets and opportunities for the publication of new knowledge.

Keywords:
*analytic survey journal advertisements promotion costs and volume PROMOTIONAL TECHNIQUES: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS VOLUME OF AND EXPENDITURE ON PROMOTION

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909