corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4012

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Greenwood J.
Prescribing and salesmanship
HAI News 1989 Aug; (48):1-2, 11


Abstract:

The study examined the use general practitioners made of information sources and their impact upon prescribing for both new and current medications. Although most general practitioners considered professional sources more important than commercial ones, 36% considered the sales representative a “very important influence”. When GPs were asked to state which source they had used in the decision to prescribe a new drug, the sales representative received the highest frequency of mentions. In the case of one product,some 77% of GPs favoured the “commercial” view of a product rather than the weight of medical evidence, while “commercial” views of three other products were favoured by 55%, 28% and 13% of GPs respectively. Sales representatives were also interviewed. The most striking finding here was that two thirds of the responses could be regarded as critical of the pharmaceutical industry as a whole and just under half of the responses were comments which were directly critical of representatives as a group.

Keywords:
*analytic survey/United Kingdom/primary care doctors/sales representatives/source of information/attitude toward promotion/attitude toward industry/quality of prescribing/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: SALES REPRESENTATIVES/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DETAILING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE/PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: DOCTORS

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963